The potential
revenue opportunities available to SPs depend upon the strategic fit to their
business. Specifically, we evaluated the
opportunities across three strategic fit criteria:
1.
Core Business – How closely is the solution or
service aligned with the SP’s core business (e.g., using existing assets,
leveraging current business operations and expertise, in regional footprint)
2.
Stretch – To what extent would new investments
or operations be required to deliver the solution or service (e.g., Capex for
new assets, creation of new business operations, acquisition of new expertise,
out of region play)
3.
Deal Dependent – To what extent would the nature of
the deal and the governance structure influence the potential revenues
available? (e.g., vendor or lead, city investment or PPP)
Assessing the
smart city revenue opportunities across these criteria reveals a number of
strategic options for how SPs can think about approaching the smart city
opportunity:
·
Core Business – essential part of the existing SP
business – Network Connection
·
Closely Aligned – typically some of these are part of
the existing SP business, or not very far removed from existing capabilities – Network Access; Technology Platform
·
New Area – new investments and capabilities
would be required, but typically leveraging some existing capabilities – Operational Services; Smart City Solutions
·
Stretch – these are area that are not
typically part of the existing SP business and would require considerable
investment and new build – Program
Management, Orchestration
·
Deal Dependent – these are the new sources of
monetization (subscription, advertising, analytics, etc.); the realization of
which will be dependent upon the deal structure – Monetization
Returning to
our example of a smart city deployment for a city like Seattle in the USA
(metropolitan population of 3 million), service providers could potentially
generate new revenue across each of the strategic options as shown below.
For a
typically medium size city deployment, like Seattle, a typical service provider
could potentially generate at least $15M in new annual revenues from core or
closely aligned businesses. Or, roughly one-half of the total smart city
opportunity. A global
market opportunity of $3 to $4 billion of new annual revenues is readily within
the grasp of SPs to help cities to deploy smart city initiatives. And, that number could increase
considerably if a service provider is willing to make investments in creating
new capabilities and expertise.
While there
is a significant upside of new potential revenue, smart cities often have a
broader strategic context for service providers. As described in How
SPs Can Profit from Digital Cities,
there are additional benefits, beyond the direct revenue benefits, that SPs
should also evaluate when assessing their involvement and options in smart
cities. Consideration of Ancillary Benefits (e.g., rights of way
for network deployment on city assets; upsell to city, local businesses and
consumers; customer retention) and Indirect
Benefits (branding; PR/communications; customer experience; regulatory
relief; government relations), together with the new sources of revenue, can
create a very compelling business case for a SP’s active involvement in smart
city opportunities.